Description and History
The Fox River Trolley Museum operates on a remnant of the Aurora, Elgin & Fox River Electric Company's interurban line, which ran north and south along the Fox River, connecting its namesake towns west of Chicago. Passenger service ended in 1935, but freight service continued on a short section to the State Mental Hospital in Elgin (electrically powered until 1946, diesel afterwards). Museum operations began in 1966. Freight service ended in 1971, after which the museum had the line to itself.
The Fox River Trolley Museum suffered a terrible burglary, that was discovered on July 7th. As reported everywhere, two boys, 11 & 13 tunneled under the barn wall and did over $110,000 of damage across all seven cars inside the barn. Fox Valley Trolley Museum is such a walk back in time. A low key experience. Great for young and old. We brought our grandma who is 100. She's lived in the fox valley her whole life and used to ride the trolley. The conductor's give a little history presentation as you ride the. Fox River Trolley Museum: Exhibits. History buffs, locomotive enthusiasts, weekend adventurers, and more will be blown away by the array of train and trolley cars on display at the Fox River Trolley Museum. You can explore a wooden train car built all the way back in 1887 or hop on a Rapid Transit car from the industrious 1940s.
Pictures
The following pictures were taken in July 1991, during the museum's annual summer Trolley Festival.
[picture] A view of the grounds looking back towards the car barn. The yellow steeplecab electric locomotive at left was built in 1908 by the Chicago City Railways.
[picture] Wooden car #20 of the Chicago, Aurora & Elgin Railway was built in 1902 by Niles Car Company.
[picture] Interior of #20. This was the car that I rode on my visit.
[picture] Car #7 of the Chicago, South Shore & South Bend Railroad (South Shore Line) was built by Pullman in 1926.
Fox Valley Railroad
[picture] Car #715 of the Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee (North Shore Line) was built by the Cincinnati Car Company in 1930.
[picture] In front, Chicago Rapid Transit car #4451 was built in 1924 by the Cincinnati Car Company; behind it, CRT's steel-aluminum car #5001 was built in 1947 by Pullman-Standard as a prototype for later cars.
Other Sites
- Fox River Trolley Museum (official Web site)
- More pictures at the Fox River Trolley Museum page on Dave's Electric Railroads
- Forbidden Donut's Fox River Trolley Museum Photo Gallery
This page was last updated on 20 April 2006, and reviewed on 25 January 2008.
This page is © 2006 by Jon Bell.If you're interested in using these pictures, please read myterms of usage.
Page 2 of 3
| [ 35 posts ] | Go to pagePrevious1, 2, 3Next |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Post subject: South Elgin, IL Trolley Museum Break in and Vandalism |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:17 pm Posts: 274 Location: Houston, TX
| Two boys, 11 and 13 charged in Museum Breakin, Burglary and Vandalism http://abc7chicago.com/3772508/
|
|
Post subject: Re: South Elgin, IL Trolley Museum Break in and Vandalism |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:17 pm Posts: 274 Location: Houston, TX
| More, including link to go fund me page: https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/boys ... ey-museum/ https://www.nbcchicago.com/on-air/as-se ... 42411.html https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/D ... 43051.html https://www.gofundme.com/fox-river-trolley-museum
|
|
Post subject: Re: South Elgin, IL Trolley Museum Break in and Vandalism |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:29 pm Posts: 1503 Location: Youngstown, OH
| Previous thread on the same subject I merged both together into one topic. _________________ Rick Rowlands J&L Narrow Gauge Railroad 'The shortest and narrowest Railroad in Ohio'
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:19 pm Posts: 1974 Location: Sackets Harbor, NY
| From the currently available evidence it would appear that the 2 vandals come from prosperous looking neighborhoods and thus most likely from parents that have some positive net worth. If that assumption proves correct I would urge the museum leadership to sue both sets of parents for every cent of damage plus plenty for legal fees and ' pain & suffering'. Objective being to both cover the needed repairs and to send an unmistakable signal to the community of not being anyones punching bag. IMHO-Ross Rowland
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 2:46 pm Posts: 2220 Location: Pac NW, via North Florida
| omprehensive is for what happens to you, not what you do to others (as that's liability) and certainly not for an intentional act. I'm using the term in a generic sense, not legal/technical terminology. That'd be like saying a trolley is a steam locomotive, 'in a generic sense.' It's not apples and oranges; that'd be like apples and telephone poles. Remember this the next time you nitpick someone else's posts.I would urge the museum leadership to sue both sets of parents for every cent of damage plus plenty for legal fees and ' pain & suffering'. Nobody gets anything beyond actual damages in such a case. 'Pain and suffering' refers to what is actually known in the industry as 'general' damages in an injury liability case (where you can prove non-economic damages that would vary from person to person based on the non-financial effects on their lives). You don't get anything extra for a property damage case. Getting your legal fees compensated varies by the type of case and the legal venue. I'm not familiar with Illinois in that regard. And even if you do win, it's no guarantee you'll ever see a penny. _________________ Lee Bishop
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:45 am Posts: 517 Location: Illinois
| I would urge the museum leadership to sue both sets of parents for every cent of damage plus plenty for legal fees and ' pain & suffering'. Nobody gets anything beyond actual damages in such a case. 'Pain and suffering' refers to what is actually known in the industry as 'general' damages in an injury liability case (where you can prove non-economic damages that would vary from person to person based on the non-financial effects on their lives). You don't get anything extra for a property damage case. Getting your legal fees compensated varies by the type of case and the legal venue. I'm not familiar with Illinois in that regard. And even if you do win, it's no guarantee you'll ever see a penny. So, you make sure you provide evidence of any revenue that was lost, due to the equipment being unavailable. Previous ticket sales for this year, and previous comparable dates in the preceding years, should provide a basis for anyone with a halfway decent mind, and a pocket calculator to figure an acceptable figure out. You include lost wages for and every volunteer who missed time at their 'real' job to deal with the immediate aftereffects of this crime. You include professional estimates for repairs to any damages to they caused to the barn. You do an asset search on every member of the responsible families, and you put leins on their homes for any amount they do not pay immediately. As others have said, you send a strong message that you are no ones stepstool, and while you want to be a good neighbor, that's a 2 way street! Jeff _________________
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:40 am Posts: 481
| The problem though is once you tick off the neighborhood it's only a matter of time before you become the next ITM. People want you gone then they will vote for whom ever promises to follow through with the removal of your beloved museum from the community. Politicians can find no end of ways to make your life painful or forcefully remove your organization from the community in favor of a parks and rec center or swimming pool or even worse, more housing projects. More and more of the youngest people care less about a big yard full of rusty or vintage railway vehicles. To those none railfans out there your collection is just a pile of scrap metal waiting to become SUV's and kitchen appliances. The newer generations are not very interested in railways or vintage locomotives. They are wanting and waiting for tomorrow's technologies. Robert
|
|
Fox River Trolley Museum Roster
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:52 am Posts: 24
| I don't really see how seeking restitution from criminals would get a bad reaction from the community. Most people don't care at all. In these suburban places, the 'tough on crime' attitude is normal as well as contempt for everyone else's unruly kids. The litigation won't get reported on. From a potential customer point of view, the number of parents that have to worry about this is zero because their kids arent going to do anything and it won't affect attendance at all. Who causes 100 stacks of damage? Its an extraordinary situation.
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:52 am Posts: 24
| Insuring real estate and facilities is easy. The problem with insuring museum relics like antique rolling stock is putting an arbitrary value on something that is 'priceless' while at the same time not having a market value to go by. Some insurance companies will be happy to insure any amount on anything you ask, if you pay. Will they pay? If they do pay, the thing might well be destroyed anyway or else there is not much that makes a claim worthwhile. Either way the organization is kind of screwed.
|
|
Fox River Trolley Museum Youtube
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 9:48 am Posts: 622 Location: Byers, Colorado
| I hate to say this, and I bet nobody wants to hear it, but how about using plexiglass for some of these restored windows ??? Maybe FRA approved glazing ??? Same for headlight lenses, and numberboard glasses. _________________ At Your Service, Sammy KIng
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 2:46 pm Posts: 2220 Location: Pac NW, via North Florida
| You're entitled to the full cost of restoring back to pre-loss condition. That's an important point, one that is missed by many. You don't get to have the stuff be better off than right before the loss, once the repairs are done (or paid). That's called, 'betterment' and no carrier owes that. Insuring real estate and facilities is easy. The problem with insuring museum relics like antique rolling stock is putting an arbitrary value on something that is 'priceless' while at the same time not having a market value to go by. Some insurance companies will be happy to insure any amount on anything you ask, if you pay. Will they pay? If they do pay, the thing might well be destroyed anyway or else there is not much that makes a claim worthwhile. Either way the organization is kind of screwed. In some cases, you can get an estimate from the local contractor (pick a really good one, one that is known to charge more than the fly by night guys, like a outfit that deals with restoring old homes) and that amount might be a lot more than what it'd cost for your own people to do the work. You'd get to pocket the difference if that's the case. They owe for what it'd take commercially to have the work done. If you can do it for less, that's no concern of the insurance carrier. Happens all the time with antique and beater cars. Fire/renter/homeowner claims folks can get stymied really fast by the unusual. It's a box they can't easily check. I know with antique cars, I've seen people defer to the estimates of restoration companies when cashing the owners out, and I know those were usually way more than the local normal body shop. I don't really see how seeking restitution from criminals would get a bad reaction from the community. It's little kids. There are plenty of do-gooders who feel that little Johnny had some kind of reason for busting out the windows, and the big-bad 'old white guys and their 1:1 scale toy trains' are just beating up on them. I've seen something similar happen with a military museum several years ago. It got really ugly for the people who'd been broken into by kids about the same age as these. In that case, it got turned into an ethnic thing, if you catch my drift. The problem though is once you tick off the neighborhood it's only a matter of time before you become the next ITM. People want you gone then they will vote for whom ever promises to follow through with the removal of your beloved museum from the community. Politicians can find no end of ways to make your life painful or forcefully remove your organization from the community in favor of a parks and rec center or swimming pool or even worse, more housing projects. You might have a point there, one I hadn't thought of. _________________ Lee Bishop
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:52 am Posts: 24
| From criminal restitution, the museum might not even be legally entitled to the full amount of reimbursement from each household, but some cap. Seeking this or going further with litigation if that is even possible is not 'beating up'. It is just the ugly process that has to happen. Excuses are better off for some amount of damage much less than 100k. There is also no ethnic angle in this case, I'm pretty sure.
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 5:55 pm Posts: 1321
| If you use the courts the way they like to operate you can get some restitution. A friend of mine was hit by a driver without insurance in Denver, he followed through with the DA and the court and even though the driver was poor the judge forced her to make payments every month for years afterward or go to jail. My friend treated it as a debt he was owed, and the court was able to wrap itself around that concept and force payment. If you go in there saying you want to punish these kids and make a statement to the world about juvenile delinquency etc. the court will blink twice and stop listening to what you are saying, because that isn't what they do.
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:46 am Posts: 2570 Location: S.F. Bay Area
| how about using plexiglass for some of these restored windows ??? Maybe FRA approved glazing ??? Not FRA glazing. FRA has a funny rule about that; if your vehicle is exempt (all Fox River's are) and you put FRA glazing on it anyway, then you are on the hook to maintain FRA glazing forever. And the stuff loves to yellow and fog.
|
|
Post subject: Re: Fox River Trolley Museum: $150,000 in vandalism |
|
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:37 pm Posts: 1487
| Just to pick what might be a significant nit down the line: you would not want to replace any window on equipment preserved outdoors with 'Plexiglas' (which is acrylic plastic, prone to various kinds of environmental degradation as well as brittle fracture). What you'd be using is 'Lexan', which is polycarbonate. (And this is soft, so easy to scratch, and as noted historically prone to discolor over time. I do not know how serious the degradation in a careful preservation environment, where stiff nylon brushes aren't routinely used with caustic cleaners for maintenance and the plastic has been made or treated with UV stabilizers or hard surface coating. _________________ R.M.Ellsworth
|
|
Fox River Trolley Museum St. Louis 1953 Pcc 1030
Page 2 of 3
| [ 35 posts ] | Go to pagePrevious1, 2, 3Next |